Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Police reports


A total of 15 police reports were lodged at the Petaling Jaya District Police headquarters at 7.00pm on Jan 26. One report was launched by the Malaysian Dogs Deserve Better (MDDB) canine welfare project whilst the remaining 14 were lodged by MDDB supporters. MDDB has also urged its supporters from other parts of the Klang Valley to lodge similar reports within the next few days. We view the matter very seriously and will continue to pursue it until the culprits are brought to book.

Looks like SPCA Singapore acted much faster than all the SPCAs in Malaysia.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

POLICE REPORT


MALAYSIAN DOGS DESERVE BETTER (MDDB) will lodge a police report against the poodle abusers at the Petaling Jaya district police headquarters at 7.00pm today. Directions to police station. Turn into the PJ Hilton. The hotel must be on your left. Just after PJ Hilton you will come to a traffic light, turn right, go straight until you come to a T-Junction - turn left and you can see the police station. See you there at 7.00pm.

DOG ABUSER






We were horrified with this video and how the person in it can abuse the dog in such a way. We have received uncountable complaints and our Facebook friends had gone on a collective hunt for the indisputable human being. We are impressed with the work they have done and we now have a name. We urge you to help us find these animals as well and the two locations that we have been given is OUG and Penang. Please see link for more info.

The dogs belongs to one Doreen Loo and the abuser is said to be her boyfriend.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Malaysian-Dogs-Deserve-Better/64173243307#!/profile.php?id=100000786306757

There were pictures of the poodle standing in her FB album but they have since been disabled but someone managed to save this:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Malaysian-Dogs-Deserve-Better/64173243307#!/album.php?aid=5003&id=100000786306757

Check : http://www.facebook.com/pages/Malaysian-Dogs-Deserve-Better/64173243307 for more details.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Persecution of dogs rescuers, lovers and fosterers

We have been informed that a few local councils - due to bad advise - will be going around inspecting homes to see if the dogs have been licensed. They owners will be issued licenses on the spot and then given a stipulated time to get the dog vaccinated etc. This is ridiculous as the purpose of a license is not to control numbers but to indicate that the dog has been vaccinated. According to these clueless people, this is THE WAY to curb strays!!!! We are shocked with the level of ignorance shown here. The ONLY way to manage the stray problem is to implement TNRM on the streets and not by persecuting people who own dogs. Let's say these bunch of clueless people go to a fosterer's home and she has six dogs whilst the by-laws state that she can only keep one - what will happen to the other five? Let's also say that someone has four dogs she or he is only allowed two - however, the dogs do not pose a problem to anyone as they live indoors with the owners. What happens to the other two dogs? Will she or he have to 'get rid' of them? The local council should refrain itself from implementing no-brainer plans such as these and should concentrate on busting illegal breeders and refrain from abundantly giving out permits for pet shops to sell animals. The councils should also seriously look at TNRM which is working well in neighbouring countries. Why can't we successfully implement TNRM like our neighbours? Are they soooo bodoh that they can actually think that persecuting dog owners, lovers and fosterers is the solution? We have also been told that a particular exco member will be going on the rounds. We have only this to say to him - you embark on this no-brainer persecution of dog owners, lovers and fosterers - you be prepared for a demonstration against you at the State Secretariat building! Think again before you knock on doors.

What's wrong with this fellow.


A rescued dog, now a therapy dog called Dr Adonis, at work in the Philippines.

LEAVE US ALONE! GET OVER IT!!!!

We were alerted by Tracy this morning about a blog entry in Petpositive our statement in the press recently. All we said in the media was:

"The Malaysian Dogs Deserve Better canine welfare organisation urged the Department of Veterinary Services to investigate the living conditions and the kind of treatment previously received by the two dogs.

“The department should also find out if the dogs had a mix of the pit bull breed, which is banned in Malaysia for its ferocious streak,” said coordinator Christine Lai.

We were stating a fact. However, Anthony Thanasayan is going onand on and calling us names. We have included his post as well as marked his abuse against us. He even refutes the Wikipedia notes which were supported with a generous footnote. He is labelling us as people who are dissemeniting hatred fopr dogs. What about his statement below in Free Malaysia Today:

ANTHONY WAS QUOTED AS SAYING: “For example, it’s difficult to predict a mongrel’s behaviour due to its mixed parentage. It’s best to use pedigree dogs. ''
Isn't this dissemeniting prejudices against mixed breeds? More so that Animals Asia Foundation Jill Robinson uses rescued dogs, including mixed breed, in her Dr Dog therapy dog programme???

His Blog Entry
Local Dog Blog Slammed For Spreading Prejudice About Pit Bulls - Slammed By Whom??????

GUESS WHAT FOLKS?
That noisome local dog blog - name intentionally withheld to "protect" the guilty (sic) - has very obviously bit off more than it could chew. - Pray tell how we have bitten off more than we can chew?

This happened when one of its members claimed to the media recently that pit bulls innately possess a "ferocious streak". - This is a true fact which many people including trainers and vets will support.

Now they are shamelessly trying to add a new spin to its story! - How so?


An unmatched breed
The blog author is now coming up with an even more ridiculous clanger saying that what the group meant to say was that pit bulls are okay as pet dogs - but but not as guard animals. Yes, and we explain why as well as stress the difference between pets, watch dogs and guard dogs.

And the reason for that big "NO! NO!" is also because of what the blogger - with a notoriety of using foul language - is adamantly claiming that pit bulls have a "natural ferocious streak". Ask other animal experts and they'll tell you the same.

What a load of codswallop! According to you - but that's not what experts and academic journals say.

This is typically what happens with people who are essentially amateurs. So the experts, vets and academic papers are all amateurs???

They try to proclaim themselves as so-called "experts" about dogs just because they happen to save one or two animals in distress. Wow, we can see the green-eyed monster clearly here.

Don't get me wrong.
The rest not worth responsding to as its purely ramble and rant.
Anyone who saves innocent and homeless dogs and cats from the streets and gives them a good home deserves a big pat on the back.

Blog spreading breed racism
However, to cross one's boundaries and try to portray themselves as an animal egghead is really too much.

Let us not become nutcases in such situations. Instead, let's educate ourselves with the facts of the matter.

PETPOSITIVE is against the discrimination of canines of any breeds.

We have - and will always maintain that it is never the problem with the dogs but the owners who should be brought to the book in situations where an animal has gone bad - except in situations if and when it rabies is involved.

Service pit bull
We firmly maintain that pit bulls make wonderful pets as well as in whatever service they have to perform; whether it be in crime-control, animal-assisted therapy or just a house pet.

What is of primary importance is that pit bulls should be bred by good breeders and raised up under the guidelines of good responsible ownership.

Back to the irresponsible blog and its author who is only spreading disinformation about pit bulls, and by doing so also harming the perceptions of all dog breeds including mongrels, please get your facts right from the people who work with pit bulls - and not from a cursory glance from Google or Wikipedia or even some crap purportedly on the Internet from the CIA!

Covering up your howler about pits will only make you look more stupid.

Here are some common myths about pit bulls that need to be debunked:

* Pit Bulls' jaws lock down like no other breed.

RUBBISH: Studies show that the jaw of the Pit Bull is in proportion to its size and is no different than any other breed of dog. There is no evidence that any kind of "locking mechanism" exists in the American Pit Bull Terrier.

* Pit Bulls are mean and violent (the 'ferocious streak' thingy).

NONSENSE: According to the American Temperament Test Society, Pit Bulls pass the test with flying colors. In fact, the Pit Bull scores 82% or more. The success of Pit Bulls in this series of tests proves they are not naturally mean or violent.

* Pit Bulls cannot be used for protection work:

CLAPTRAP: The first United States war dog was a Pit Bull named Stubby. Stubby served in World War I and was honored with medals and a visit to the White House. He went on to inspire the United States Military K-9 Corp.

Here are more facts about the wonderful Pit Bull Breed:

* Pit Bulls have long served as therapy dogs. In fact, Helen Keller's canine helper was a Pit Bull. Organizations such as the Chako Rescue Association have Pit Bull therapy dogs across the country in Utah, California and more.

For more about this great breed of dogs, please visit this excellent Pit Bull rescue group's web page:

PIT BULLS AND PAROLEES

As to the local dog blog that is spreading distortions about Pit Bulls, and at the same time claiming to be a animal rescue group: they should be ashamed of themselves!

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Selayang Pound Bodoh!

UPDATE: We received word at 4.00pm that the dog was released to its feeder who has found a place for the dog to be quarantined. Given that the pound has a history of being a place infested with distemper and parvo viruses, it will first have to be kept isolated before sending to the veterinary clinic for spaying.
Dr. Razif Zainol Abidin
Pengarah Kesihatan
e-Mel: razif@mps.gov.my
Tel : 03-61370757 Faks : 03-61388300
Selangor's premier dog abuser the Selayang pound, which belongs to the Selayang Municipal Council, has done it again. Are the people managing it as bodoh as they behave? An independent rescuer who has been feeding a stray in Selayang, with the aim of befriending the dog pending vaccination and spaying before rehoming, was devastated when the dog went missing about a week ago. Her week long search led her to the Selayang pound where she found the dog. She asked to adopt the dog and said she was willing to pay whatever compound imposed on her. She had to use an intermediary as she has been banned from the pound for exposing the cruelty there several months ago. She was asked to go to the office where she was asked to apply for a license immediately. Are these people so bodoh that they do not know that to get a license the dog has to be vaccinated and photographed first? Are we wasting our tax RM paying for bodohs like this to man counters dealing with the public? They have isolated the dog upon request but knowing that the pound is still managed by Dr Razif and Evil Ernie, we won't be surprised if they rush to put the dog down. From this episode we know that Cruel Dr Razif and Evil Ernie are fueled by their personal prejudices against dogs - as they would rather kill them than allow the dogs to be rescued. I think its time for the Selayang Pound to be kicked in the butt again and let's see if their mascot will wheel himself there and defend their cruelty as he did the last time around.

The DVS Selangor has been informed

The Selangor DVS has been informed about the cruelly treated German Shepherd in Kota Kemuning and will be going there to do the necessary. Thanks again DVS.